The Impact of Environmental Factors and Time Constraints on English Language Learning: Challenges in Second Language Acquisition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v9i5.10707Keywords:
Second Language Acquisition, English Language Learning, Environmental Factors, Time Constraints, SLA Challenges, Qualitative Study, Language Learning Environment, Educational Policy.Abstract
This study analyzes the interaction between environmental factors and time constraints on English acquisition at Modern Islamic Boarding School Darussalam Gontor Ponorogo. Its novelty lies in holistically integrating socio-cultural, physical, technological, and temporal dimensions previously unexplored comprehensively in Indonesian boarding school contexts. Using a six-month qualitative phenomenological design, data from five teachers and fifteen students were collected through in-depth interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis, then analyzed using Braun & Clarke's (2006) thematic analysis. Findings reveal time management as the dominant factor (9.2/10), followed by cultural exposure (8.3), independent study time (8.0), and peer interaction (7.5). Supportive social environments increase motivation by 78%, dedicated time allocation improves speaking ability by 65% and writing by 70%, while technology access and classroom design increase engagement by 60% and 55% respectively. Synergistic interaction between environment and time management yields 85% proficiency improvement. This study confirms the necessity of holistic approaches integrating contextual-temporal factors for optimizing second language learning in modern boarding schools.
References
Ahmed, S., Khan, M. A., & Hassan, T. (2022). Physical learning environments and language acquisition in madrasah education: A Pakistani case study. International Journal of Educational Development, 95, 102675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102675
Allington, R. L. (2005). What really matters for struggling readers: Designing research-based programs (pp. 82–85). Pearson.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bruner, J. S. (2022). The process of education (Revised commemorative ed.). Harvard University Press.Carol, M. (2001). Technology in language learning: Integrating online resources. Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed., pp. 251–252). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed., pp. 4–5). SAGE Publications.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 118–120). SAGE Publications.
Ellis, R. (2015). Understanding second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2008). Researching second language acquisition (pp. 3–20). Oxford University Press.
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100015047
Fu, X., Nguyen, T. L., & Tran, P. H. (2024). Factors impeding university students' participation in English extracurricular activities: Time constraints and personal obstacles. Heliyon, 10(5), e3363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e3363
Ghimenton, S., Unsworth, S., & Paradis, J. (2024). The role of environmental factors on grammatical development in French–English bilinguals attending a dual language programme in France. Languages, 10(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages10010006
Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching (p. 89). Pearson Longman.
Hu, Y., Zhou, Y., & Deng, J. (2024). The effects of planning time on vocabulary acquisition in task-based language teaching: The mediating role of working memory and cognitive styles. BMC Psychology, 12, Article 109. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01638-4
Idris, A. R., Hanafiah, M. H., & Ahmad, S. (2021). Resolving learning time and space constraints while engaging in English language learning acquisition among open distance learners (ODL) using web-mobile platforms: Edmodo and Telegram. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(11), 955–967. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i11/10590
Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. D. (2020). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom (Updated ed.). Alemany Press.
Long (1996) + tambahkan: Sato, M., & Loewen, S. (2022). The interactional feedback perspective on second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 42, 87-111.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed., pp. 103–110). Jossey-Bass.
Ministry of Communication and Information Technology. (2023). Digital infrastructure report: Islamic boarding schools in Indonesia. Government of Indonesia.
Ministry of Religious Affairs. (2023). Statistical report on Islamic education in Indonesia 2022/2023. Directorate General of Islamic Education.Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods (pp. 21–23). SAGE Publications.
Nguyen, T. H., Le, V. C., & Tran, M. Q. (2023). Self-directed learning time and English proficiency: A Vietnamese higher education perspective. System, 116, 103078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103078
Nicoladis, E., & Mott-Smith, B. (2023). Input quantity and bilingual French–English children’s grammatical development. Languages, 8(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8010010
Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology: A textbook for teachers (pp. 45–47). Prentice Hall.
Opperman, C. J. (2020). Investigating the effect of time constraints on English language proficiency tests. African Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajopa.v2i0.20
Paradis, J. (2023). How much exposure is enough? Input and timing in bilingual development. Journal of Child Language, 50(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000922000361
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed., pp. 264–265). SAGE Publications.
Philp, J., Oliver, R., & Mackey, A. (2006). The impact of planning time on children’s task-based interactions. System, 34(4), 547–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.08.003
Puspitasari, D., & Rahman, A. (2024). Technology access and digital literacy in Indonesian Islamic boarding schools: Challenges and opportunities. Education and Information Technologies, 29(2), 1847-1868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11956-3
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (pp. 105–107). Cambridge University Press.
Rod, E. (1997). Second language learning contexts (p. 54). Oxford University Press.
Rod, E. (2008). Language learning and teaching research (p. 101). Routledge.
Schulz, P., & Grimm, A. (2019). The age factor revisited: Timing in acquisition interacts with age of onset in bilingual acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00446
Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second language learning (p. 134). Edward Arnold.
Unsworth, S. (2019). Amount of exposure as a proxy for dominance in bilingual language development. Languages, 4(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4020023
Daniels, H., Cole, M., & Wertsch, J. V. (Eds.). (2023). The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.1.1
Zhang, L., & Li, X. (2023). Peer interaction and oral English development in Chinese boarding schools: A longitudinal study. Language Teaching Research, 27(4), 891-915. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211034789
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dwiana Novitasari, Arina Shofia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
