Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kreativitas Siswa melalui Analisis Rasch Model di Sekolah Dasar

Authors

  • Mila Aprilia Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Dindin Abdul Muiz Lidinillah Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Rosarina Giyartini Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i4.1199

Keywords:

Keterampilan Kreativitas, Analisis Rasch Model

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilatar belakangi oleh pentingnya penerapan kreativitas dalam diri manusia di lingkungan sehari-harinya. Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk menunjukan deskripsi dari hasil analisis pengembangan instrumen penilaian kreativitas siswa Sekolah Dasar. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode kuantitatif dan menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif, serta partisipan penelitian merupakan siswa Kelas IV SDN 2 Sukapura, salah satu sekolah di kabupaten Tasikmalaya, dengan jumlah sebanyak 30 responden. Hasil penelitian menujukkan bahwa pengembangan instrumen kreativitas sebagian besar berada pada kategori baik dengan proporsi sebesar 70%. Melalui analisis ini, diketahui bahwa tingkat kemampuan siswa lebih besar dalam menyelesaikan item pada instrumen kreativitas siswa, dibuktikan oleh hasil penelitian yang menunjukan angka item pada separation dan reliability lebih besar dibandingkan angka person pada separation dan reliability. Selain itu pengembangan instrumen kreativitas ini dapat di terima oleh seluruh responden (tidak mengalami bias gender).

References

Abdul, D., Lidinillah, M., Aprilia, M., Suryana, D., & Ahmad, A. B. (2020). Development of Creativity Instrument through Rasch Model Analysis. 8(4), 1620–1627. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080455

Andrey Satya Darmawan, Djamhur Hamid, M. D. M. (2019). Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja Dan Kemampuan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan. Jurnal Lentera Bisnis, 8(1), 95. https://doi.org/10.34127/jrlab.v8i1.262

Atmosukarto, K. (1994). Cara Pengambilan dan Penentuan Besar Sampel untuk Penelitian Sosial. IV(01).

Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2008). Gender differences in creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01289.x

Barone, T., & Bresler, L. (2006). Artistic choices: A study of teachers who use the arts in the classroom. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 7(8), 1–27.

Budiarti, L., Tarno, & Warsito, B. (2013). ANALISIS INTERVENSI DAN DETEKSI OUTLIER PADA DATA WISATAWAN DOMESTIK (Studi Kasus di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta). 2(January 2006), 39–48.

Budiarti, Y. (2015). Pengembangan Kemampuan Kreativitas Dalam Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, 3(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.24127/ja.v3i1.143

Chan, S. W., Ismail, Z., & Sumintono, B. (2014). A Rasch Model Analysis on Secondary Students’ Statistical Reasoning Ability in Descriptive Statistics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 129, 133–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.658

Creswell W. John. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitave, and Mixed Methods Approaches. In Sage (third). https://doi.org/10.2307/1523157

Dupri, Nazirun, N., & Candra, O. (2021). Creative Thinking Learning of Physical Education: Can Be Enhanced Using Discovery Learning Model? Journal Sport Area, 6(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.25299/sportarea.2021.vol6(1).5690

Hafina, A., Rusmana, N., Yustiana, Y. R., & Suryana, D. (2016). The Development of Empathy Skills For Guidance and Counseling Teacher Candidates.

Hemlin, S., Allwood, C. M., & Martin, B. R. (2008). Creative knowledge environments. Creativity Research Journal, 20(2), 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802060018

Ilhami, R. S., & Rimantho, D. (2017). Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan dengan Metode AHP dan Rating Scale. Jurnal Optimasi Sistem Industri, 16(2), 150. https://doi.org/10.25077/josi.v16.n2.p150-157.2017

Jati, F. (2018). Telaah kreativitas. Research Gate, (October), 0–21.

Kaufman, J. C. (2006). Self-reported differences in creativity by ethnicity and gender. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(8), 1065–1082. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1255

Kenedi. (2017). Pengembangan Kreativitas Siswa dalam Proses Pembelajaran di Kelas II SMP Nergeri 3 Rokan IV Koto. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Sosial, Sains, Dan Humaniora, 3(2), 329–348. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/suara%20guru.v3i2.3610

Khoiri, N., Riyadi, S., Kaltsum, U., Hindarto, N., & Rusilawati, A. (2017). Teaching Creative Thinking Skills with Laboratory Work. International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series, 2(1), 256. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v2i1.16722

Mulyadi, M. (2013). Penelitian Kuantitatif Dan Kualitatif Serta Pemikiran Dasar Menggabungkannya. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi Dan Media, 15(1), 128. https://doi.org/10.31445/jskm.2011.150106

Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B. A., & Wright, P. M. (2016). Fundamental of Human Resource Management : Gaining A Competive Advantage.

Nurhudaya, Taufik, A., Yudha, E. S., & Suryana, D. (2019). The Raven’s advanced progressive matrices in education assessment with a Rasch analysis. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(9), 1996–2002. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070921

Rahminawati, N. (2001). Isu Kesetaraan Laki-Laki dan Perempuan (Bias Gender). Jurnal Sosial Dan Pengembangan, 17(3), 273–283. https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v17i3.48

Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The Standard Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092

Sumarni, E., Setiandi, A. E., & Sunandar, A. (2020). Profile of conceptual photosynthesis and creative thinking: Study of 7th-grade students. Biosfer, 13(2), 250–265. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.v13n2.250-265

Sumintono, B. (2014). Model Rasch untuk Penelitian Sosial Kuantitatif. Makalah Kuliah Umum Di Jurusan Statistika, ITS Surabaya, 21 November 2014, (November 201), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.1134

Suryana. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian : Metodologi Penelitian Model Prakatis Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 1–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2

Syarifah, I. (2019). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian untuk mengukur kreativitas siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika. Retrieved from http://digilib.uinsby.ac.id/id/eprint/34439

Wijayanto, A. R. (2007). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Komitmen Pelanggan Melalui Peran Tenaga Penjual (Studi Kasus pada PT YMKI di wilayah Jawa Tengah dan DIY). 1–67.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-21

How to Cite

Aprilia, M., Lidinillah, D. A. M., & Giyartini, R. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kreativitas Siswa melalui Analisis Rasch Model di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(4), 2302–2310. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i4.1199

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 4 (2021): August Pages 1683- 3000

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).