Peningkatan Kemampuan Literasi Digital Guru SD melalui Pelatihan AI, Canva, dan Wayground
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v10i4.12150Keywords:
literasi digital, guru sekolah dasar, aplikasi digital, daerah terpencil, metode campuranAbstract
Rendahnya kompetensi literasi digital guru di daerah terpencil masih menjadi tantangan dalam mendukung transformasi pembelajaran berbasis digital. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengukur peningkatan kompetensi literasi digital guru melalui pelatihan pemanfaatan aplikasi digital berbasis Artificial Intelligence (AI), Canva, dan Wayground di SD USABA Simpang Hulu, Kabupaten Ketapang, Kalimantan Barat. Penelitian menggunakan metode campuran dengan desain kuantitatif one-group pretest-posttest serta pendekatan kualitatif melalui observasi dan wawancara tidak terstruktur terhadap delapan guru. Hasil uji Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test menunjukkan peningkatan kompetensi yang signifikan secara statistik (W = 36,0; p = 0,012) dengan nilai N-Gain sebesar 0,544 dalam kategori sedang. Peningkatan tertinggi terjadi pada aspek kemudahan penggunaan aplikasi (N-Gain = 0,706) dan kepercayaan diri guru (N-Gain = 0,643). Analisis Cohen’s d menunjukkan efek sangat besar pada kemudahan penggunaan aplikasi, efisiensi persiapan materi, dan kepercayaan diri guru. Frekuensi penggunaan aplikasi digital juga meningkat dari 12,5% menjadi 50% guru yang menggunakan aplikasi secara sering hingga sangat sering. Meskipun demikian, sebagian besar guru masih menghadapi kendala infrastruktur. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa peningkatan literasi digital guru memerlukan pelatihan yang berkelanjutan serta dukungan infrastruktur dan kebijakan yang memadai.
References
Aiken, L. R. (1980). Content Validity and Reliability of Single Items or Questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40(4), 955–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000419
Amemasor, S. K., Oppong, S. O., Ghansah, B., Benuwa, B. B., & Essel, D. D. (2025). A Systematic Review on The Impact of Teacher Professional Development on Digital Instructional Integration and Teaching Practices. Frontiers in Education, 10(May), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1541031
Andriani, A. D. (2025). Transformasi Digital Pendidikan di Indonesia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/397455340
Antonietti, C., Schmid, M., & Petko, D. (2022). What do We Know About Teachers’ Use of Digital Technologies? A Systematic Literature Review. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 8, artikel 100230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100230
Aurangzeb, W., Kashan, S., & Rehman, Z. U. (2024). Investigating Technology Perceptions Among Secondary School Teachers?: A Systematic Literature Review on Perceived Usefulness and Ease of Use. Academy of Education and Social Sciences Review, 4(2), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.48112/aessr.v4i2.746
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W. H. Freeman and Company.
Cabero-Almenara, J., Palacios-Rodríguez, A., Loaiza-Aguirre, M. I., & Andrade-Abarca, P. S. (2024). The Impact of Pedagogical Beliefs on The Adoption of Generative AI in Higher Education: Predictive Model from UTAUT2. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7(October), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1497705
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for The Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., Gardner, M., & Espinoza, D. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. (June).
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
European Commission. (2020). Digital Education Action Plan 2021–2027: Resetting Education and Training for The Digital Age. https://education.ec.europa.eu/focus-topics/digital-education/action-plan
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-Engagement Versus Traditional Methods: A Six-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Halimatussakdiah, Nabila, M., Muharrina, H., Nurmayani, Angin, L. M. P., & Manurung, I. F. U. (2025). Pendampingan Literasi Digital untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Sekolah PGSD FKIP UNMED, 9(3), 427–434. https://doi.org/10.24114/jh.v15i1.59542
ITU. (2025). Measuring Digital Development: Facts and Figures 2025. https://www.itu.int/itu-d/reports/statistics/facts-figures-2025/
Kemdikdasmen. (2025). Percepat Transformasi Pendidikan Presiden Luncurkan Digitalisasi Pembelajaran untuk 288 Ribu Sekolah. Kemdikdasmen. https://www.kemendikdasmen.go.id/siaran-pers/14151-
Khairatunnisa, Suriansyah, A., & Purwanti, R. (2025). Manajemen Pendidikan Adaptif di Era Digitalisasi: Tinjauan Literatur Review. Sindoro: Cendikia Pendidikan, 16(3), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.99534/1cr1cq92
Kittinger, L., & Law, V. (2024). A Systematic Review of The Utaut and Utaut2 Among K-12 Educators. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 23(17). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.28945/5246
Lemon, N., & Garvis, S. (2013). What Is The Role of Ict in The Pre-Service Teacher Education Classroom to Support Future Confidence and Competence In The Digital Age? Teachers and Teaching, 19(3), 246–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2012.754162
Lestari, A. R. (2025). Trnsformasi Pendidikan di Era Revolusi 5.0. Firdaus Journal, 5(1), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.37134
Listiyoningsih, S., Hidayati, D., & Winarti, Y. (2022). Strategi Guru Menghadapi Transformasi Digital. Jurnal Imliah Profesi Pendidikan, 7(2b), 655–662. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v7i2b.389
Miao, F., & Cukurova, M. (2024). AI Competency Framework for Teachers. In UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/zjte2084
Mukuka, A., & Alex, J. K. (2024). Profiling Mathematics Teacher Educators’ Readiness for Digital Technology Integration: Evidence from Zambia. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 28(2), 315–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-024-09657-z
Munadzifah, & Fradana, A. N. (2025). Efektivitas Literasi Digital untuk Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar. CJPE?: Cokroaminoto Juornal of Primary Education, 8(2), 938–954. https://e-journal.my.id/cjpe
Mustika, Syahputri, H. K., Azzahrah, M., Kharimah, N., & Safaruddin. (2026). Guru Digital Atau Guru Analog: Tantangan Penggunaan Teknologi di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 10(3), 848–859. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v10i3.11910
Or, C. (2024). Thirty-Five Years of The Technology Acceptance Model: Insights from Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modelling. OTESSA Journal, 4(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18357/otessaj.2024.4.3.66
Prestridge, S. (2017). Examining The Shaping of Teachers’ Pedagogical Orientation for The Use of Technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(4), 367–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2016.1258369
Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2017). European Framework for The Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
Resta, P., & Laferriere, T. (2015). Digital Equity and Intercultural Education. Education and Information Technologies, 20(4), 743–756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9419-z
Sawilowsky, S. S. (2009). New Effect Size Rules of Thumb. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 8(2), 597–599. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1257035100
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2020). The Self-Related and Social Facets of Teachers’ Digital Competence: The TPACK-Based Instruments. Computers & Education, 152, artikel 103876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103876
Simbolon, N., Sinaga, O. S., & Daiyan, E. (2025). Urban and Rural Teacher Perspectives on Indonesian Educational Reform: Challenges and Policy Implications. Cogent Education, 12(1), Article 2497142. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2497142
Sinha, S., & Bagarukayo, K. (2019). Online Education in Emerging Economies: Exploring The Factors That Affect Students’ Aspirations and Motivation to Study in Online Programs. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 15(3), 5–30.
Teo, T. . (2011). Factors Influencing Teachers’ Intention to Use Technology: Model Development and Test. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2432–2440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.008
Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2016). Preparing Pre-Service Teachers to Integrate Technology in Education: A Synthesis of Qualitative Evidence. Computers & Education, 59(1), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.009
Uerz, D., Volman, M., & Kral, M. (2018). Teacher Educators’ Competences in Fostering Student Teachers’ Proficiency in Teaching and Learning with Technology: An Overview of Relevant Research Literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 70, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.005
UNESCO. (2025). AI and Education: Protecting The Rights of Learners. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/ai-and-education-protecting-rights-learners
van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2020). The Digital Divide. Polity Press.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
Viera, A. J., & Garrett, J. M. (2005). Understanding Interobserver Agreement: The Kappa Statistic. Fam Med, 37(5), 360–363. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15883903/
Watini, S., Nuryani, S., Saripah, E., Widayani, H., Kurniasih, N., & Janah, R. N. (2025). Pemanfaatan Canva Dan AI sebagai Media Pembelajaran Digital untuk Guru PAUD: Studi Pengabdian Masyarakat di Kota Tasikmalaya. Jurnal Masyarakat Madani Indonesia, 4(3), 436–443. https://doi.org/10.59025/q3pqtq26
Wong, L.-H., Chai, C. S., & Aw, G. P. (2022). Scaffolding in Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments: Bridging Learning Design and Learning Analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(6), 1477–1491. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13268
Xue, L., Mahat, J., & Ghazali, N. (2026). Technology Acceptance Model in Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Meta-Analysis. SAGE Open, 16(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251409441
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Katherine Ivana Hadi, Theresia Trivonia Bria, Nicolaus Abrian Dewantoro, Sebastianus Widanarto Prijowuntato, Johanes Baptis Judha Jiwangga
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
