Pengaruh Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa di Sekolah Dasar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i4.1227Keywords:
kemampuan berpikir kritis, POGIL, sekolah dasar, kalor dan perpindahannyaAbstract
References
Amijaya Lalu Sunarya, Agus Ramdani, I. W. M. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Terhadap Hasil Belajar Dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik. 13(2), 38–87.
Barthlow, M. J. (2011). The effectiveness of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry learning. 319.
Brown, S. D. (2010). A process-oriented guided inquiry approach to teaching medicinal chemistry. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 74(7), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj7407121
Cross, K. P., & Angelo, T. A. (1988). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for faculty. The National Center for Research to Improve Post-Secondary Teaching and Learning.
Devi, E. K., Sulistri, E., & Rosdianto, H. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (Pogil) Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Pada Materi Hukum Archimedes. Konstan - Jurnal Fisika Dan Pendidikan Fisika, 4(2), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.20414/konstan.v4i2.42
Ennis, R. H. (1996). Critical Thinking Dispositions: Their Nature and Assessability. Informal Logic, 18(2), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v18i2.2378
Facione, P. a. (2011). Critical Thinking : What It Is and Why It Counts. Insight Assessment, ISBN 13: 978-1-891557-07-1., 1–28. https://www.insightassessment.com/CT-Resources/Teaching-For-and-About-Critical-Thinking/Critical-Thinking-What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts/Critical-Thinking-What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts-PDF
Guleker, R., & Keci, J. (2014). The effect of attendance on academic performance. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(23), 961–966. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n23p961
Handayani, S. L., Budiarti, I. G., Kusmajid, K., & Khairil, K. (2021). Problem Based Instruction Berbantuan E-Learning : Pengaruhnya terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(2), 697–705. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i2.795
Hanson, D. M., Bunce, D., Creegan, F., Moog, R., Padwa, L., Spencer, J., Straumanis, A., Wolfskill, T., & Hanson, D. M. (2006). Instructor ’ s Guide to Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning by With Contributions from other POGIL project personnel : Instructor ’ s Guide to Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning. 56.
Kowiyah. (2012). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 3(5), 175–179.
Lestari Desak Putu Sri, Made Sulastri, I. G. M. (2016). Pengaruh Model Pogil Dan Gaya Kognitif Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ipa Pada Siswa Kelas V Sd. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 49(2), 70. https://doi.org/10.23887/jppundiksha.v49i2.9011
Ningsih, S. M., & Bambang, S. (2012). Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (Pogil) Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. UPEJ (Unnes Physics Education Journal), 1(2). https://doi.org/10.15294/upej.v1i2.1364
Pendidikan, K. (2016). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Sd Mi. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 1(3).
Possin, K. (2017). Thinking Critically About Richard Paul ’ s Critical Thinking. Association for Informal Logic and Critical Thinking, 1(1), 1–10.
Prathama, I. W. G. O., Margunayasa, I. G., & Wibawa, I. M. C. (2017). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran POGIL Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA pada Siswa Kelas V SD. 52.
Rahayu Dita Puji, P. S. D. (2015). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritispeserta Didik Pada Materi Perubahan Benda. USEJ - Unnes Science Education Journal, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.15294/usej.v4i3.8836
Rostina, S. (2018). Statistika Penelitian Pendidikan. Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2017). Statistika Untuk Penelitian (p. 390). Alfabeta.
Sulistyowarni, P. A. D., Prahani, B. K., Supardi, Z. A. I., & Jatmiko, B. (2019). The effectiveness of OR-IPA teaching model to improve students’ critical thinking skills on senior high school physics subject. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032011
Yasushi, G. (2011). Development of Critical Thinking Rubric. 13 International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age ( CELDA 2016), Celda, 2010–2012.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).