EVALUASI PROGRAM KEWIRAUSAHAAN DI SDK21 PENABUR

Authors

  • Gendis Woro Pawestri Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta Timur, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Syarif Sumantri Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta Timur, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Erry Utomo Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta Timur, Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v4i1.172

Keywords:

Evaluasi Program, entrepreneurship, siswa sekolah dasar

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hasil belajar peserta didik di SDK Penabur dalam pelaksanaan program kewirausahaan terutama dalam penguasaan ketrampilan (skills) dan karakter serta perolehan nilai dalam ujian nasional. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode evaluasi dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Design model dalam penelitian ini menggunakan  model CIPP. Penelitian ini dilaksakan di SDK Penabur wilayah Jabodetabek. Hasil menunjukkan tiga aspek yang dievaluasi yakni hasil belajar siswa, respon orang tua, dan respon siswa. Pada aspek hasil belajar, semua kriteria dinyatakan telah terpenuhi. Adapun aspek respon orang tua dan siswa terdapat beberapa kriteria yang belum sesuai yakni kriteria orang tua dan siswa yang memahami hakekat, maksud dan manfaat dari penyelenggaraan program entrepreneurship. Implikasi dalam penelitian ini, diharapkan program entrepreneurship berdampak pada motivasi belajar siswa dan membudayakan kecakapan life skill siswa sekolah dasar

References

Daryanto, & Karim, S. (2017). Pembelajaran Abad 21. Jakarta: Gava Media.

M.L.Carcamo-Solís et al. Teaching and Teacher Education, 64:291-304,2017. Diakses dari https://www.journals.elsevier.com/teaching-and-teacher-education

Anderson, K., & Jeffery, V. (1998). What Are Good Child Outcomes ? Education Resources Information Center, 1–40.

Connor, D. O., & Connor, D. O. (2015). The golden thread : educator connectivity as a central pillar in the development of creativity through childhood education . An Irish life history study history study. International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education ISSN:, 3(13), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2014.999343

Daryanto, & Karim, S. (2017). Pembelajaran Abad 21. Jakarta: Gava Media.

Gofen, A., & Blomqvist, P. (2013). Parental entrepreneurship in public education : a social force or a policy problem ? Journal of Education Policy, 29(4), 546–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2013.858275

Hegarty, C., & Jones, C. (2008). Graduate entrepreneurship : more than child ’ s play. Emerald, 50(7), 626–636. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910810909072

Kasapoglu, K., Didin, M., & Life, M. (2019). Life Skills as a Predictor of Psychological Well-Being of Pre-Service Pre-School Teachers in Turkey. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research Volume, 6(1), 70–85.

Kurtdede-fidan, N. (2018). Life Skills from the Perspectives of Classroom and Science Teachers. International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(1), 32–55. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2018.129.4

Lee, L., & Lai, C. (2010). An Exploratory Survey of Prospective Childcare Givers ’ Entrepreneurial Potential in Taiwan. In International Conference on Business and Information (pp. 1–11). Kitakyushu, Japan.

Longman, P., Mundy, L., Black, R., Bornfreund, L., Byrum, G., Cramer, R., … Mccarthy, M. A. (2015). The Case for Building a Social Policy Centered on Families. In Family Centered Social Policy (pp. 1–22).

OECD. (2015). PISA 2015 Results (Volume IV): Students’ Financial Literacy (Vol. IV). https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264270282-en

Pearson, R. (2014). Social Enterprises and Social Sector Workforces. In Workforce Initiatives Discussion (pp. 1–4). Social Change Group.

Plum, M. (2014). A ‘globalised’ curriculum – international comparative practices and the preschool child as a site of economic optimisation. Studies in the Cultural Politics OfEducation, 35(4), 570–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2013.871239

Rajawali. (2009). Kewirausahaan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Ruskovaara, E., & Pihkala, T. (2015). Entrepreneurship Education in Schools: Empirical Evidence on the Teacher’s Role. The Journal of Educational Research, 108(3), 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2013.878301

Schmitt, E. (2004). Pathways to successful entrepreneurship : Parenting , personality , early entrepreneurial competence , and interests, 65, 498–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2003.10.007

Shavinina, L. (2013). How to develop innovators ? Innovation education for the gifted. Gifted Education International, 29(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429412440651

Siregar, Y. E. Y. (2018). Self Regulation , Emotional Intelligence acWith Character Building In Elementary School. In Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (Vol. 251, pp. 315–318). Atlantis Press.

Syah, M. (2010). Psikologi Pendidikan Dengan Pendekatan Baru. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Wijatno, S. (2009). Pengantar Entrepreneurship. Jakarta: PT. Grasindo.

Wijaya, D. (2017). Pendidikan Kewirausahaan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Downloads

Published

2020-04-01

How to Cite

Pawestri, G. W., Sumantri, M. S., & Utomo, E. (2020). EVALUASI PROGRAM KEWIRAUSAHAAN DI SDK21 PENABUR. Jurnal Basicedu, 3(3), 861–869. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v4i1.172

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 3 (2019): July Pages 850 - 993

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).