Kemampuan Guru Junior dalam Mengajarkan Proses Berpikir untuk Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Sederhana: Studi pada Guru Matematika Sekolah Dasar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i1.1941Keywords:
kemampuan guru, proses berpikir, soal cerita, matematika, sekolah dasarAbstract
Riset deskriptif kualitatif ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kemampuan guru dalam melatih siswa untuk menuliskan proses berpikir dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita matematika yang sederhana. Lima belas guru matematika junior yang tergabung dalam grup WhatsApp dilibatkan pada riset ini. Data diperoleh dengan memanfaatkan tes tulis dan wawancara yang hasilnya dianalisis menggunakan pendekatan content analysis. Kemampuan guru junior dikategorikan menjadi 3 level, yaitu 4 guru berpengetahuan matematika tingkat lanjut, 8 guru berpengetahuan matematika sangat memadai, dan 3 guru berpengetahuan matematika cukup memadai. Dari semua guru junior yang terlihat, tidak satupun dari mereka memunculkan proses berpikir secara tertulis pada proses penyelesaian soal cerita. Mereka lebih fokus pada kebenaran hasil akhir. Pertimbangan ini dilakukan oleh guru karena (1) kelulusan pada ujian akhir tidak dilihat dari proses berpikir tertulis, tetapi pada kebenaran hasil akhir, dan (2) kurikulum yang diberikan pemerintah tidak mendorong guru untuk menuntut siswa menuliskan proses berpikirnya. Peneliti selanjutnya dapat berinovasi dalam mendesain soal dan rubrik penilaian yang mempertimbangkan proses berpikir pada penyelesaian soal, baik untuk matematika atau bidang studi lain.
References
Abdurrahman, M. S., Abdullah, A. H., & Osman, S. (2020a). Developing mathematical thinking among polytechnic students in linear algebra through peer tutoring strategy. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 12(3), 423–434. https://doi.org/10.5373/JARDCS/V12I3/20201210
Abdurrahman, M. S., Abdullah, A. H., & Osman, S. (2020b). Design and development of linear algebra peer tutoring strategy to develop students mathematical thinking processes based on experts’ evaluation. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(8), 3592–3607. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080836
As’ari, A. R., Kurniati, D., & Subanji. (2019). Teachers expectation of students’ thinking processes in written works: A survey of teachers’ readiness in making thinking visible. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(3), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.3.7978.409-424
Bintoro, H. S., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Mulyono, & Walid. (2021). The spatial thinking process of the field-independent students based on action-process-object-schema theory. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(4), 1807–1823. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.10.4.1807
Falloon, G. (2016). An analysis of young students’ thinking when completing basic coding tasks using Scratch Jnr. On the iPad. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(6), 576–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12155
Ferdiani, R. D., Manuharawati, & Khabibah, S. (2022). Activist Learners’ Creative Thinking Processes in Posing and Solving Geometry Problem. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.1.117
Hobri, Susanto, H. A., Hidayati, A., Susanto, & Warli. (2021). Exploring thinking process of students with mathematics learning disability in solving arithmetic problems. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 9(3), 498–513. https://doi.org/10.46328/IJEMST.1684
Kristayulita, K., Nusantara, T., As’ari, A. R., & Sa’dijah, C. (2020). Schema of analogical reasoning-thinking process in example analogies problem. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2020(88), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2020.88.4
Kurniati, D., Sunardi, Trapsilasiwi, D., Sugiarti, T., & Alfarisi, M. A. (2017). Thinking process of visual-spatial intelligence of 15-year-old students in solving pisa standard problems. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2017(December Special Issue INTE), 686–694.
Mustafa, N., Said, M. N. H. M., Ismail, Z., & Tasir, Z. (2017). Mathematical problem solving skills among high achiever students. Advanced Science Letters, 23(8), 7494–7498. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.9506
Mutakinati, L., Anwari, I., & Yoshisuke, K. (2018). Analysis of students’ critical thinking skill of middle school through stem education project-based learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i1.10495
Pratiwi, E., Nusantara, T., Susiswo, S., & Muksar, M. (2020). Textual and contextual commognitive conflict students in solving an improper fraction. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(2), 731–742. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.678528
Quezada, V. nica D. a. (2020). Difficulties and performance in mathematics competences: Solving problems with derivatives. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 10(4), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v10i4.12473
Soboleva, E. V., Sabirova, E. G., Babieva, N. S., Sergeeva, M. G., & Torkunova, J. V. (2021). Formation of Computational Thinking Skills Using Computer Games in Teaching Mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(10), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11177
Sujadi, I., & Masamah, U. (2017). Mathematical reflective thinking processesof senior high school students. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 25(September), 115–126.
Syamsuddin, A., Juniati, D., & Siswono, T. Y. E. (2020). Understanding the Problem Solving Strategy Based on Cognitive Style as a Tool to Investigate Reflective Thinking Process of Prospective Teacher. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(6), 2614–2620. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080644
Syawahid, M., Purwanto, Sukoriyanto, & Sulandra, I. M. (2020). Elementary students’ functional thinking: From recursive to correspondence. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(3), 1031–1043. https://doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS.765395
Tohir, M., Maswar, M., Moh, A., Saiful, S., & Rizki Pradita, D. A. (2020). Prospective teachers’ expectations of students’ mathematical thinking processes in solving problems. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1735–1748. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.9.4.1735
Umar, B. S. (2014). A Cognitive Analysis of Problem-Based Learning in Teaching Mathematics at Senior Secondary School Level. Usmanu Danfodiyo University Sokoto.
Uyangör, S. M. (2019). Investigation of the mathematical thinking processes of students in mathematics education supported with graph theory. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070101
Wijaya, A., Retnawati, H., Setyaningrum, W., Aoyama, K., & Sugiman. (2019). Diagnosing students’ learning difficulties in the eyes of Indonesian mathematics teachers. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(3), 357–364. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.3.7798.357-364
Woranetsudathip, N., & Yuenyong, C. (2015). Enhancing grade 1 Thai students’ learning about mathematical ideas on addition through lesson study and open approach. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2S1), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.5901/MJSS.2015.V6N2S1P28
Zeynivandnezhad, F., & Bates, R. (2018). Explicating mathematical thinking in differential equations using a computer algebra system. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(5), 680–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1409368
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
