Pengaruh Daya Juang dan Kemandirian Belajar Secara Online terhadap Tanggung Jawab Belajar Mahasiswa PGSD

Nurdin Arifin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.2244

Article Metrics

Abstract Views : 212 times
PDF Downloaded : 175 times

Abstract


Pembelajaran yang terjadi selama masa pandemi covid-19 mengakibatkan pembelajaran dilakukan secara online. Para mahasiswa dituntut untuk lebih banyak belajar secara mandiri. Daya juang, kemandirian belajar secara online, dan tanggung jawab belajar memainkan peranan penting dalam pembelajaran. Penelitian ini dilakukan kepada mahasiswa PGSD Universitas Widya Gama Mahakam semeseter 3 tahun ajaran 2021/2022 yang terdiri dari 116 mahasiswa. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan menggunkan uji prasyarat dan uji hipotesis. Uji prasyarat menggunakan uji normalitas, uji multikolinearitas, uji heteroskedastisitas. Uji Hipotesis yang digunakan menggunkan uji regresi linear berganda. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya pengaruh daya juang dan kemandirian belajar secara online terhadap tanggug jawab belajar mahasiswa yang ditunjukkan dengan diperolehnya hasil perhitungan dengan menggunkan regresi linear berganda yakni nilai Fhitung sebesar 21,002 lebih dari Ftabel sebesar 3,05. Berarti dikatakan adanya pengaruh daya juang dan kemandirian belajar secara simultan terhadap tanggung jawab belajar mahasiswa. Jika berdasarkan  uji hipotesis secara parsial diperoleh 1) terdapat pengaruh daya juang terhadap tanggung jawab belajar mahasiswa PGSD; 2) adanya pengaruh kemandirian belajar secara online terhadap tanggung jawab belajar mahasiswa PGSD.

Keywords


daya juang; kemandirian belajar secara online; tanggung jawab belajar; online learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aksan, N. (2009). World Conference on Educational Sciences 2009 A descriptive study : epistemological beliefs and self regulated learning. 1, 896–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.159

Allan, G. M. (2006). Responsibility for learning : students ’ understandings and their self-reported learning attitudes and behaviours. Queensland: Queensland University of Technology.

Arifin. (2020). Efektivitas pembelajaran STEM problem based learning ditinjau dari daya juang dan kemampuan pemecahan. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia (JPMI), 5(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jpmi.v5i1.1644

Artino, A. R. (2012). Academic self-efficacy: from educational theory to instructional practice. Perspectives on Medical Education, 1(2), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-012-0012-5

Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Osland, V., & Lai, S. (2009). Internet and Higher Education Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005

Burke, A. (2013). Competency 10 . Take primary responsibility for lifelong learning to improve knowledge , skills , and practice performance through familiarity with general and experience-specific goals and objectives and attendance at conferences Ann Burke , MD. Academic Pediatrics, 14(2), S54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2013.11.063

Carpenter, J. P., & Pease, J. S. (2013). Preparing Students to Take Responsibility for Learning: The Role of Non-Curricular Learning Strategies. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction (JoCI), 7(2), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.3776/joci.2013.v7n2p38-55

Engelhardt, B., Johnson, M., & Meder, M. E. (2021). International Review of Economics Education Learning in the time of Covid-19 : Some preliminary findings. International Review of Economics Education, 37 (September 2020), 100215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2021.100215

Fernández, D. L. (2015). Children ’ s Everyday Learning by Assuming Responsibility for Others : Indigenous Practices as a Cultural Heritage Across Generations. 53–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acdb.2015.08.005

Fritz, J. (2017). Using Analytics to Nudge Student Responsibility for Learning. 179, 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.20244

Hastuti, T. D., Sari, S., & Riyadi. (2018). Student profile with high adversity quotient in math learning Student profile with high adversity quotient in math learning. IOP Publishing, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012131

Hussein, E., Daoud, S., Alrabaiah, H., & Badawi, R. (2020). COVID-19 : A Case from the UAE. Children and Youth Services Review, 105699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105699

Molenaar, I., Horvers, A., & Baker, R. S. (2019). What can moment-by-moment learning curves tell about students ’ self- regulated learning ? Learning and Instruction, May, 101206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.05.003

Semradova, I., & Hubackova, S. (2016). Teacher Responsibility in Distance Education. 217, 544–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.042

Sugiyono. (2017). Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sujarweni, V. W. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian. Bantul: Pustaka Baru Press.

Wang, X., Liu, M., Tee, S., & Dai, H. (2021). International Journal of Nursing Sciences Analysis of adversity quotient of nursing students in Macao : A cross- section and correlation study. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 8(2), 204–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2021.02.003

Zheng, C., Liang, J., Yang, Y., & Tsai, C. (2016). The relationship between Chinese university students ’ conceptions of language learning and their online. System, 57, 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.01.005

Zheng, J., Xing, W., Zhu, G., Chen, G., & Zhao, H. (2020). Computers & Education Pro fi ling self-regulation behaviors in STEM learning of engineering design. Computers & Education, 143(August 2019), 103669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103669


Altmetric Dimensions

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Nurdin Arifin

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.