APPLYING MATH REVIEW GAME METHOD IN ORDER TO INCREASE COGNITIVE LEARNING OUTCOMES AND STUDENTS INVOLVEMENT LEVEL IN MATHEMATIC LESSON
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v3i4.282Keywords:
learning outcomes, involvement level, review gameAbstract
This research purposed to increasing cognitive learning outcomes and involvement level of Mountainview Christian Elementary School fifth grade students with applying active learning and review game method. The research that be done is Classroom Action Research which had two cycle. Data in this research gotten from observation, questionnaire, and test then analyzed in percentage form. Learning outcomes result analyzed based on the minimum completeness criteria percentage whether individual or general. The result of the research show that the student learning outcomes result in general increased. In the first cycle the students that pass the minimum completeness criteria was 85% and increased in the second cycle become 100% , the learning outcomes average in the first cycle is 9.23 increased in the second cycle become 9.73. learning outcomes that increased also followed by the increasing of student involvement level about 15% from the first cycle which is 54% categorized as enough become 77% in the second cycle categorized as active. From this research result concluded that the applying of active learning with review game could increasing cognitive learning outcomes and involvement level of the students.
References
Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Education Goals: Handbook I, cognitive domain. New York: Toronto: Longmans, Green.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow-The Phsycology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper Perennial.
Darmansyah. (2010). Strategi Pembelajaran Menyenangkan dengan Humor. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
DePorter, B., Mark Reardon, & Sarah Singer-Nourie. (2001). Quantum Teaching: Mempraktikkan Quantum Learning di Ruang-ruang Kelas. Edisi Terjemahan oleh Ary Nilandari. Cetakan IV. Bandung : Kaifa.
Dryden, G., & Vos, D. (1999). The Learning Revolution. New Zealand: The Learning Web.
Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Smith, K. (1991). Active Learning: Cooperation in The College Classroom. Edina: MN: Interaction Book Company.
KEMDIKBUD. (2013, Februari 20). Konsep dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Retrieved from https://www.kemdikbud.go.id /: https://www.kemdikbud.go.id /kemdikbud/dokumen/paparan/paparan%20Wamendik.pdf
Kline, P. (1823). The Everyday Genius. North Lincoln Street, Airlington: Great Ocean Inc.
Kunandar. (2012). Langkah Mudah Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
Mc Clintock, C. (1982). Problem Solving: Some Means and Some Ends. In P. o. Association, Problem Solving in the Mathematic Classroom (p. 9). ATA.
Silver, H., Brunsting, J., & Walsh, T. (2012). Math Tools, Grades 3–12: 60+ Ways to Build Mathematical Practices, Differentiate Instruction, and Increase . California: Corwin Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
