Pemetaan Pemahaman Konsep pada Materi Pencemaran Lingkungan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v7i6.4404Keywords:
Instrumen, Pemahaman Konsep, Pengembangan, Reabel, ValidAbstract
Pemahaman konsep pada hakikatnya adalah sesuatu yang memiliki hubungan dengan penguasaan materi, yang mana dengan menguasai materi yang sudah ada. Pada penelitian ini instrumen yang digunakan dan diterapkan tidak sesuai dengan objek yang seharusnya, maka objek penelitian tidak dapat dilakukan dan data tidak dapat terkumpul. Penelitian ini juga dilakukan untuk menguji valid, konsistensi, dan reabel dari pemahaman konsep. Tujuan penelitian untuk mengembangkan instrument pemahaman konsep peserta didik melalui materi pencemaran lingkungan. Metode yang dipakai dalam penelitian yaitu (RnD) yang dikemukakan oleh Allesi and Trollip untuk evaluasi. Hasil penelitian yang diperoleh yaitu didapatkan nya data-data untuk pengembangan kemampuan pemahaman konsep yang melibatkan 75 responden, data pengembangan ini dikumpulkan melalui google from. Hal ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa sudah ditemukan ke validan dan reabel, angka hasil dari data penelitian tersebut yang akan menunjukkan bahwa penelitian ini telah berkembang dan instrumen yang digunakan berkualitas
References
Abdullah, M. N. S., Karpudewan, M., & Tanimale, B. M. (2021). Executive function of the brain and its influences on understanding of physics concept. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 24(June), 100159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2021.100159
Akpur, U. (2020). Critical, Reflective, Creative Thinking and Their Reflections on Academic Achievement. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37(July). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100683
Aslan, A. (2021). Problem- based learning in live online classes: Learning achievement, problem-solving skill, communication skill, and interaction. Computers and Education, 171(May), 104237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104237
Ates, O., & Eryilmaz, A. (2010). Factors affecting performance of tutors during problem-based learning implementations. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2325–2329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.330
Ayyildiz, P., & Yilmaz, A. (2021). ‘Moving the Kaleidoscope’ to see the effect of creative personality traits on creative thinking dispositions of preservice teachers: The mediating effect of creative learning environments and teachers’ creativity fostering behavior. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41(June), 100879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100879
Belland, B. R., Weiss, D. M., & Kim, N. J. (2020). High school students’ agentic responses to modeling during problem-based learning. Journal of Educational Research, 113(5), 374–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2020.1838407
Chen, L., Yoshimatsu, N., Goda, Y., Okubo, F., Taniguchi, Y., Oi, M., Konomi, S., Shimada, A., Ogata, H., & Yamada, M. (2019). Direction of collaborative problem solving-based STEM learning by learning analytics approach. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-019-0119-y
Chen, X., Gong, C., Wan, Q., Deng, L., Wan, Y., Liu, Y., Chen, B., & Liu, J. (2021). Transfer learning for deep neural network-based partial differential equations solving. Advances in Aerodynamics, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42774-021-00094-7
Ching, B. H. H., & Wu, X. (2019). Concreteness fading fosters children’s understanding of the inversion concept in addition and subtraction. Learning and Instruction, 61(October), 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.10.006
Christner, N., Pletti, C., & Paulus, M. (2020). Emotion understanding and the moral self-concept as motivators of prosocial behavior in middle childhood. Cognitive Development, 55(December 2019), 100893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100893
Del Grosso, S. J., Smith, W., Kraus, D., Massad, R. S., Vogeler, I., & Fuchs, K. (2020). Approaches and concepts of modelling denitrification: increased process understanding using observational data can reduce uncertainties. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 47, 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2020.07.003
Dou, X., Li, H., & Jia, L. (2021). The linkage cultivation of creative thinking and innovative thinking in dance choreography. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41(June), 100896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100896
Geitz, G., Brinke, D. J. Ten, & Kirschner, P. A. (2016). Changing learning behaviour: Self-efficacy and goal orientation in PBL groups in higher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 75, 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.11.001
Gomez, C. J., & Lazer, D. M. J. (2019). Clustering knowledge and dispersing abilities enhances collective problem solving in a network. Nature Communications, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12650-3
Hartmann, C., Rummel, N., & Bannert, M. (2022). Using HeuristicsMiner to Analyze Problem-Solving Processes: Exemplary Use Case of a ProductiveFailure Study. Journal of Learning Analytics, 9(2), 66–86. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2022.7363
Ismail, N. S., Harun, J., Zakaria, M. A. Z. M., & Salleh, S. M. (2018). The effect of Mobile problem-based learning application DicScience PBL on students’ critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 28, 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.04.002
Johnson, A. (2020). 97. Moving Beyond the Risk of Psychological Distress: The Use of Concept Analysis to Expand Understanding of the Posttreatment Experiences of Adolescents Treated for Cancer. Journal of Adolescent Health, 66(2), S50–S51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.11.100
Kuo, H. C., Tseng, Y. C., & Yang, Y. T. C. (2019). Promoting college student’s learning motivation and creativity through a STEM interdisciplinary PBL human-computer interaction system design and development course. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.09.001
Ouyang, F., Chen, Z., Cheng, M., Tang, Z., & Su, C. Y. (2021). Exploring the effect of three scaffoldings on the collaborative problem-solving processes in China’s higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00273-y
Pöysä-Tarhonen, J., Awwal, N., Häkkinen, P., & Otieno, S. (2021). Joint attention behaviour in remote collaborative problem solving: exploring different attentional levels in dyadic interaction. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-021-00160-0
Robinson, K. M., Price, J. A. B., & Demyen, B. (2018). Understanding arithmetic concepts: Does operation matter? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 166, 421–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.09.003
Ruiz-Gallardo, J. R., González-Geraldo, J. L., & Castaño, S. (2016). What are our students doing? Workload, time allocation and time management in PBL instruction. A case study in Science Education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 53, 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.10.005
Sánchez-Bravo, P., Chambers V, E., Noguera-Artiaga, L., Sendra, E., Chambers IV, E., & Carbonell-Barrachina, Á. A. (2021). Consumer understanding of sustainability concept in agricultural products. Food Quality and Preference, 89, 104136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104136
Sarkar, P., Kadam, K., & Pillai, J. S. (2020). Learners’ approaches, motivation and patterns of problem-solving on lines and angles in geometry using augmented reality. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00124-9
Segundo Marcos, R. I., López Ferández, V., Daza González, M. T., & Phillips-Silver, J. (2020). Promoting children’s creative thinking through reading and writing in a cooperative learning classroom. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36(June 2019), 100663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100663
Seibert, S. A. (2021). Problem-based learning: A strategy to foster generation Z’s critical thinking and perseverance. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 16(1), 85–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2020.09.002
Uriel, C., Sergio, S., Carolina, G., Mariano, G., Paola, D., & Martín, A. (2020). Improving the understanding of Basic Sciences concepts by using Virtual and Augmented Reality. Procedia Computer Science, 172, 389–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.165
Waite, R., & Hassouneh, D. (2021). Structural competency in mental health nursing: Understanding and applying key concepts. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 35(1), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2020.09.013
Wallace, B., Knudson, D., & Gheidi, N. (2020). Incorporating problem-based learning with direct instruction improves student learning in undergraduate biomechanics. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 27(July), 100258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2020.100258
Yang, J., & Zhao, X. (2021). The effect of creative thinking on academic performance: Mechanisms, heterogeneity, and implication. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40(April 2021), 100831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100831
Yildiz, C., & Guler Yildiz, T. (2021). Exploring the relationship between creative thinking and scientific process skills of preschool children. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39(December 2020), 100795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100795
Yuste, S., Zarandona, J., Arrue, M., & Gravina, L. (2021). Exploring the effect of two different teaching strategies on first-year nursing students’ understanding of nutritional concepts: A mixed-method approach. Nurse Education in Practice, 56(August), 103193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103193
Zhang, H., Sun, C., Liu, X., Gong, S., Yu, Q., & Zhou, Z. (2020). Boys benefit more from teacher support: Effects of perceived teacher support on primary students’ creative thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37(April). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100680
Zhao, X., & Yang, J. (2021). Fostering creative thinking in the family: The importance of parenting styles. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41(June), 100920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100920
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Siti Rahmah, Adisti Yuliastrin, Rian Vebrianto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).