Pedagogical Competence: Effective Communication of Students of Primary School Teacher Education of Universitas Terbuka in Palembang

Authors

  • Alpin Herman Saputra Universitas Terbuka, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Steven Anthony Universitas Terbuka, Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i5.1481

Keywords:

Communication, Effective, Primary School Teacher Education, Pedagogical Competence

Abstract

Teacher is the party who is responsible for continuity of effective communication in learning so the teacher is urged to have a good communicative competence with students in order to obtain effective learning process. In this study teacher is students of primary school teacher education who has worked as a teacher (in-service training) or educator. This study is aimed to know how the competence of teacher in communicating effectively to the students. The research method used is mix research method (Survey and Thematic Qualitative). As a result, the level of effective communicative competence of students of primary school teacher education of UT who are also as teacher of primary school in Palembang is under the standard determined by The Ministry of Education and Culture (Kemendikbud). Hence, some ideas are formulated in Forum Group Discussion (FGD) namely the need of comprehensive training program and are continuously from the related institution, need of teacher’s supplementary book, and need of more action research on effective communication of teacher. Some indicators agreed for effective communication for teacher are (1) the importance of communication with students. (2) Competence and performance of teacher in communicating with the students. (3) Communication with the students in education. (4) Effective communication with the students. (5) Effective communication with students. (6) Obstacles in communication among the students in education. (7) Learning strategy that can build communication and cooperation among the students. (8) Communication with students in learning as educative interaction. The indicator will further be a reference in developing module for improvement of learning program in Universitas Terbuka.

References

Atika Tyagita, & Ade Iriani. (2018). Strategi Peningkatan Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru Untuk Meningkatkan Mutu Sekolah. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 5, 165–176.

Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming Qualitative Information: ThematicAnalysis and Code Development. SAGE Publications, Inc.

Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2017). Statistics for the behavioral science 10th. In Statistic for The Behavioral Science.

H.A.R. Tilaar. (2015). Pendagogik Teoritis untuk Indonesia. Kompas Media Nusantara.

Haider, S. A., Qureshi, M. M., Pirzada, S. S., & Shahzadi, I. (2015). A study of student’s motivation and its relationship with their academic performance. Journal of Resources Development and Management, 8, 9–18.

Irwantoro, N., & Suryana, Y. (2016). Kompetensi Pedagogik untuk Peningkatan dan Penilaian Kinerja Guru dalam Rangka Implementasi Kurikulum Nasional. Magenta Media.

Kemendikbud. (2019). Hasil Ujian Kompetensi Guru Kota Palembang Tahun 2018. https://npd.kemdikbud.go.id/?appid=ukg

Langeveld, M. J. (1970). Pedagogik Teoritis Sistematis, Penerjemah Simanjuntak. CV. Jemmars.

Lestari, E., & Maliki. (2006). Komunikasi yang Efektif. LAN RI.

Marsh, C. (2010). Becoming a Teacher : Knowledge, Skills and Issues. 5th edition. Pearson Education Australia.

McMillan, J. H., & Sally Schumacher. (n.d.). Research in Education: Evidence-Based Inquiry, 7th Edition. Pearson.

Othman. (2011). Pembelajaran Yang Mendidik dan Menyenangkan. . 1(1) hl. 10-17. Pedagogik Praktis Yang Berkualitas, 1(1), 10–17.

Permendikbud No. 16 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Kualifikasi Akademik dan Kompetensi Guru, Pub. L. No. Permendikbud (2014).

Purwanto, H. (2016). UPAYA MENINGKATKAN KOMPETENSI PEDAGOGIK BERTANYA MELALUI SUKA TANYA BAGI GURU YANG MENGAJAR PESERTA DIDIK BARU DI SMA NEGERI 1 DUSUN SELATAN. 11, 123–133.

Saputra, A. H. (2016). Pengembangan Karakter Guru Pembelajar melalui Tindakan Reflektif dan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (PTK). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Dasar Pengembangan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis, Kreativitas, Komunikasi, Dan Kolaborasi Dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21: Inovasi Pembelajaran Abad 21, 304–312.

Saputra, A. H., Mardiana, A., & Teguh, T. (2019). Pengembangan Topik Modul Kompetensi Pedagogik Mahasiswa PGSD Universitas Terbuka di Kota Palembang. DWIJA CENDEKIA: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik, 3(2), 113. https://doi.org/10.20961/jdc.v3i2.34666

Sprague, J. (2008). Communication Education, Goals of The International Encyclopedia of Communication. The International Encyclopedia of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecc072

Sucia, V. (2017). Pengaruh Gaya Komunikasi Guru Terhadap Motivasi Belajar Siswa. Komuniti : Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Teknologi Informasi, 8(5), 112–126. https://doi.org/10.23917/komuniti.v8i5.2942

Sugiyono. (2013). Statistika Untuk Penelitian (Revisi). Afabeta.

UU No. 5 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen, (2005).

Universitas Terbuka. (2019). Rekap Data Mahasiswa Baru & Ulang Per Masa 2019.1. Universitas Terbuka. http://sipelapor.ut.ac.id/pendas/cari_rkp_mhs_baru_ulang_pds?masa=20191&cari

Zubair, F., Dewi, R., & Kadarisman, A. (2018). Strategi Komunikasi Publik Dalam Membangun Pemahaman Mahasiswa Terhadap Penerapan PTNBH. Profetik: Jurnal Komunikasi, 11(2), 74. https://doi.org/10.14421/pjk.v11i2.1328

Downloads

Published

2021-10-01

How to Cite

Saputra, A. H., & Anthony, S. (2021). Pedagogical Competence: Effective Communication of Students of Primary School Teacher Education of Universitas Terbuka in Palembang. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(5), 42479–4260. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i5.1481

Citation Check