Model Pembelajaran Konstruktivis Metakognitif untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i2.2469Keywords:
Kritis, Biologi, Konstruktivis-metakognitifAbstract
Kemampuan berpikir kritis merupakan salah satu kemampuan yang dibutuhkan di tempat kerja. Selain itu, kemampuan berpikir kritis juga membantu dalam menyelesaikan masalah dan membangun strategi terbaik sehingga mampu membuat pekerjaan yang dilakukan menjadi lebih baik. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (PTK) pada pokok bahasan sistem koordinasi dan alat indra. Subjek penelitian merupakan siswa kelas XI salah satu sekolah di kabupaten Karanganyar. Instrumen pengumpulan data menggunakan angket kemampuan berpikir kritis dan observasi lapangan, data kemudian dianalisis menggunakan teknik analisis deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat peningkatan yang dignifikan pada tiap aspek kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik antara pra-dan pasca-siklus dengan rerata pra-siklus sebesar 32,46%, siklus 1 (50%), dan siklus 2 (78,17%). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemikiran kritis peserta didik dapat ditingkatkan dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran konstruktivis-metakognitif.Â
References
Affandy, H., Aminah, N. S., & Supriyanto, A. (2019). Analisis Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Pada Materi Fluida Dinamis Di SMA Batik 2 Surakarta. Jurnal Materi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika (JMPF), 9(1), 25–33.
Affandy, H., Nugraha, D. A., Pratiwi, S. N., & Cari, C. (2021). Calibration for Instrument Argumentation Skills on the Subject of Fluid Statics Using Item Response Theory. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1842(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1842/1/012032
Anggraeni, Y. N., Prayitno, B. A., & Ariyanto, J. (2016). Penerapan Model Konstruktivis-Metakognitif Pada Materi Sistem Koordinasi Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas XI MIA 1 SMA Negeri 6 Surakarta Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016. Bio-Pedagogi, 5(2), 48–55.
Ashman, A. F., & Conway, R. N. F. (1997). An introduction to cognitive education. Taylor & Francis Group.
Ataizi, M., & Donmez, M. (2014). Book Review: 21st Century Skills -Learning for Life in Our Times. Contemporary Educational Technology, 5(3), 272–274.
Erduran, S., & Maria, P. J. (2008). Argumentation in Science Education. Springer.
Facione, P. A. (2000). The Disposition Toward Critical Thinking: Its Character, Measurement, and Relationship to Critical Thinking Skill. Informal Logic, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v20i1.2254
Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. 1998. Insight Assessment, Pearson Education, 9, 1–28.
Forawi, S. A. (2016). Standard-based science education and critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 20, 52–56.
Franzhardi, D., & Kristiawan, M. (2021). Pengembangan Pendekatan Open-ended Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif Siswa. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(6), 5058–5069.
Hidayat, K., Sapriya, S., Hasan, S. H., & Wiyanarti, E. (2022). Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik dalam Pembelajaran Hybrid Karyadi. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(2), 1517–1528.
Jolls, T. (2008). The Impact of Technology on Character Education. Center for Meda Literacy, 1=61.
Lunn Brownlee, J., Ferguson, L. E., & Ryan, M. (2017). Changing Teachers’ Epistemic Cognition: A New Conceptual Framework for Epistemic Reflexivity. Educational Psychologist, 52(4), 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1333430
Moore, B. N., & Parker, R. (2009). Critical Thinking (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Nenadal, L., & Mistry, R. S. (2018). Teacher reflections on using inquiry-based instruction to engage young children in conversations about wealth and poverty. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 42(July 2017), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.07.008
Osborne J, E. S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in School science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020.
Osborne, R. D. P. N. J. (2000). Establishing The Norms of Scientific Argumentation in Classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312.
Peter, E. (2012). Critical thinking: Essence for teaching mathematics and mathematics problem solving skills. African Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science Research, 5(3), 39–43.
Polat, O., Aksin Yavuz, E., & Ozkarabak Tunç, A. B. (2017). The effect of using mind maps on the development of maths and science skills. Journal of Educational Sciences, 12(1), 32–45.
Pratiwi, S. N., Cari, C., Aminah, N. S., & Affandy, H. (2019). Problem-Based Learning with Argumentation Skills to Improve Students’ Concept Understanding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012065
Scriven, M., & Paul, R. (1987). Critical Thiking as Defined by The National Council for Excellence in Critical Thinking. The 8th Annual International Conference on Critical Thinking and Education.
Setyawan, R. A., & Kristanti, H. S. (2021). Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis pada Pembelajaran IPA Melalui Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning Bagi Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(2), 1076–1082.
Setyowati, R. R. (2020). The Effectiveness of Picture Simulation Game Method to Improve Critical and Creative Ability in Learning History in SMA N 1 Bandar. 398(ICoSSCE 2019), 325–327.
ten Dam, G., & Volman, M. (2004). Critical thinking as a citizenship competence: Teaching strategies. Learning and Instruction, 14(4), 359–379.
Wilks, S. (1995). Critical & Creative Thinking: Strategies for Classroom Inquiry. Pearson Education.
Yazar Soyadı, B. B. (2015). Creative and Critical Thinking Skills in Problem-based Learning Environments. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 2(2), 71–71. https://doi.org/10.18200/jgedc.2015214253
ŽivkoviĿ, S. (2016). A Model of Critical Thinking as an Important Attribute for Success in the 21st Century. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232(April), 102–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.034
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).