The Effect of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Strategies on Students' Listening Skill

Authors

  • Leonita Maria Efipanias Manihuruk University of HKBP Nommensen Pematangsiantar, Indonesia
  • Yanti Arasi Sidabutar HKBP Nommensen University Pematangsiantar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i2.2516

Keywords:

top down and bottom up strategies, listening skill, english education

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the Top Down and Bottom Up strategies had a significant effect on students' listening skills. This research was conducted with quantitative experimental research. The population of this research is the third semester students of HKBP Nommensen, Pematangsiantar University. The samples of this study were two classes which were selected by random sampling. There are 60 students. Class I as many as 30 students as the experimental group who were taught using the Top Down and Bottom Up Strategy and class II as many as 30 students as the control group who were taught without using the Top Down and Bottom Up Strategy. The instrument for collecting data is a test. To obtain the reliability of the test used the Kuder Richardson formula (KR21). The results showed that there was a significant effect of using Top Down and Bottom Up Strategies on students' listening skills.

Author Biographies

Leonita Maria Efipanias Manihuruk, University of HKBP Nommensen Pematangsiantar

English Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of HKBP Nommensen Pematangsiantar

Yanti Arasi Sidabutar, HKBP Nommensen University Pematangsiantar

Elementary School Teacher Study Program,Faculty of Teacher Training and Education HKBP Nommensen University Pematangsiantar

References

Canpolat, M., Sekvan, K., Yildirim, B., & Canpolat, S. (2015). Active listening strategies of academically successful university students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 15(60), 163–180.

Conklin, K., Alotaibi, S., Pellicer-Sánchez, A., & Vilkaitė-Lozdienė, L. (2020). What eye-tracking tells us about reading-only and reading-while-listening in a first and second language. Second Language Research, 36(3), 257–276.

Furuya, A. (2021). How do listening comprehension processes differ by second language proficiency? Top-down and bottom-up perspectives. International Journal of Listening, 35(2), 123–133.

Grosjean, F. (2020). The bilingual’s language modes 1. In The bilingualism reader (pp. 428–449). Routledge.

Hayashi Jr, P., Abib, G., & Hoppen, N. (2019). Validity in qualitative research: A processual approach. The Qualitative Report, 24(1), 98–112.

Hodge, S. R. (2020). Quantitative research. In Routledge Handbook of Adapted Physical Education (pp. 147–162). Routledge.

Jayhan, R. (2020). Using Top Down and Bottom Up Processing As a Strategy to Enhance Students’ Listening Ability at The First Grade of SMK Negeri 2 Parepare. IAIN Parepare.

Jiang, W. (2018). A correlation coefficient for belief functions. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 103, 94–106.

Kulsum, E. M. (2018). THE STUDENTS’READING ANXIETY AND READING STRATEGIES IN EFL LEARNING. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Lee Jia Yi, J., Aryadoust, V., Ng, L. Y., & Foo, S. (2020). A neurocognitive comparison of listening to academic lectures and natural sounds: implications for test validity. International Journal of Listening, 1–15.

Leonard, K. R. (2019). Examining the relationship between decoding and comprehension in L2 listening. System, 87, 102150.

Mahmud, M. (2014). The EFL Students’ Problems in Answering the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL): A Study in Indonesian Context. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 4(12).

Newman, B. M., & Newman, P. R. (2017). Development through life: A psychosocial approach. Cengage Learning.

Purba, N. (2018). The role of psycholinguistics in language learning and teaching. Tell Journal, 6(1), 47–54.

Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2017). Thanks Coefficient Alpha, We Still Need You! Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79(1), 200–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164417725127

Robinson, O. C. (2014). Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), 25–41.

Salazar Granda, J. A. (2020). Effects of Summarizing on Listening Comprehension in 8th Grade EFL Students. Universidad Casa Grande. Departamento de Posgrado.

Singh, A. S., & Masuku, M. B. (2014). Sampling techniques & determination of sample size in applied statistics research: An overview. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 2(11), 1–22.

Skinner, C. (2020). Quantitative research. In Handbook for research students in the social sciences (pp. 215–224). Routledge.

Sugiyono, M. S. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Dilengkapi dengan Metode R&D. Deepublish.

Sukma, E., Mahjuddin, R., & Amelia, R. (2017). Literacy Media Development in Improving Reading and Writing Skill of Early Class Students in Elementary School Padang Utara Padang. 118, 145–150. https://doi.org/10.2991/icset-17.2017.25

Downloads

Published

2022-03-01

How to Cite

Manihuruk, L. M. E., & Sidabutar, Y. A. (2022). The Effect of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Strategies on Students’ Listening Skill. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(2), 2783–2792. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i2.2516

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): April Pages 1500- 3199

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).